This is a title.
This is a test document. It contains WORDS in bold and Italics. The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. One or more symbols such as ° are included. I hope this works. 1! 2? $3 5%(9)
The Covert Curmudgeon
We Baby Boomers are strange because we grew up with the daily expectation of nuclear annihilation.
24 January 2020
26 April 2019
Dysphagia Blues
Dysphagia Blues
To the tune of
"Sounds of Silence" by Simon and Garfunkel.
Hello, regurge, you evil trend,
You've got me by my throat again,
With the meal that I was eating,
you insist on my repeating.
And my stomach wonders why it's just not full.
I can only drool.
You're an evil thing, dysphagia.
All I can eat is baby food.
I can't swallow what's been chewed.
It wanders up and down my throat.
There isn't any antidote
to a misery I can't blame on a fishy bone
stuck to my to backbone,
You're an evil thing, dysphagia.
It's not as if I've no appetite,
My stomach's roaring at midnight,
But if I eat, you clutch me in a choke.
You make certain that I remain awoke,
You're an evil thing, dysphagia.
The doctor doesn't think it's much
to warrant my unhappy fuss.
But it's clear he's never suffered so,
He's never not been able to swallow,
You're an evil thing, dysphagia.
I've lost too much needed weight.
I'm looking so very skeletate.
I don't know how much longer I can live like this.
Waiting on a definite diagnosis.
You're an evil thing, dysphagia.
You're an evil thing, dysphagia.
22 April 2019
"Out of Australia", a book review
Book Review..”Out of Australia”, by Steven and Evan
Strong
I’m an open minded scientist. I’m willing to listen to
people who come up with new ideas and different explanations of things that
puzzle us. It’s not at all unusual for a
bedrock concept in science to be overturned by new information. That’s what
science IS.
So when I read “Out of
Australia”, it was in a frame of mind that says “Okay...let’s hear what
you’ve got.”
In the case of “Out of Australia”, the answer is: not
much. And what there is is nonsense.
I admit that DNA samples of Aborigines...in the book
called “Originals’, indicate that Australia was settled by them about 65,000
years ago.
The authors insist that humans...Homo Sapiens...evolved
there, rather than in Africa, the current (and strongly backed up with fossils)
dogma.
There is plenty in the literature, in fossils, and in the
geological record of Olduvai Gorge and caves in South Africa that show hominid
species leading up to and including H. Sapiens originated in Africa. With the
advent of DNA analysis of hominid fossils, we know now that there was plenty of
interbreeding between the many hominid species inhabiting Africa...and later,
Eurasia.
These specimens are, in some species, over 1.2 million
years old. The current theory is that hominids (of several species) spread into
Europe and the Far East. There, Homo habilis or erectus or one of them then
made the jump to New Guinea and Australia.
The authors divert the argument by saying that some
people doubt that the early hominids were smart enough to make boats to carry
them over the sea to Australia...and on to the Americas. They claim that an
archeologist named Graham Walsh discovered cave drawings in the Kimberly that
depicted Egyptian style boats. But he refused to say where the drawings were.
Later on, a man named Wilson decided to track them down and found them. In
Walsh’s case, he took pictures. Wilson did not. The authors decided not to
include them, too.
But at least in the case of the Eurasian and Asian
continent, hominids didn’t need boats. They walked. They walked into Europe,
sometimes across a dry savannah that is now called the Mediterranean. They
could have followed the coast line clear from Africa all the way to Southeast
Asia. Once they got to what is now the Malay archipelago, IF it wasn’t
connected to Australia and N. Guinea, a boat could have easily covered the gap.
If we are talking about at least a million years, sea levels were lower then
and quite possibly, a land bridge between the two continents could have persisted. We know that there was a
connection.
There is no doubt whatsoever that somehow, hominids did
make it to the Australian continent.
But to insist that Australia was the ONLY place where earlier
species of hominid evolved into H. Sapiens, and NO WHERE else in the world is,
bluntly, not backed up by anything but wishful thinking. Stories from Aborigines
from perhaps two hundred years ago tend to...change into something the current
teller wants them to say. Remember, there are still millions of people on this
planet who believe that a deity created humans out of mud and that female
humans were created from a male’s rib. There are even people who believe that
all one needs to do is count a skeletons ribs to be able to identify it’s
gender.
Desperately trying to buttress their theory, the authors
work backwards from there, insisting that hominids moved to Australia THEN
evolved into H. Sapiens. Again, that is not unthinkable.
But the authors show nothing backing up their assertions.
Throughout the book they make some incredible claims, but without a single
picture, map, drawing, or even citation, they make it hard to take them
seriously. Instead, they whine and complain that the OAT (Out Of Africa)
backers have conspired to kick any other theory off the playing field. While the
OAT theory has plenty of solid evidence in the way of photos, fossils, rocks
and geological verification, the authors of “O of Australia’ use...oral history,
stories from the original Aborigines.
They mention fossils, tools and artifacts from Australia
found in the early 1900s. One, a complete skull, was sent to a museum in
Leipzig, Germany, was said to be destroyed in the bombings of WWII. Notes on an
amazing carving on bone, found in 1959 near Lake Valsequillo in Mexico (the
authors claim that Aborigines rode their boats to North America) purportedly
showed mammals from the Pleistocene as well as a gompothere, an elephant like
mammal that went extinct over a million years ago. Why didn’t the archeologist
take pictures of it? Display it to the world? In “1990, ...personal papers,
photographs, thousands of slides and evidence.....(was) promptly lost or
misplaced.” (pg 31).
What of the bone carvings? The authors don’t say.
Throughout the book, the authors imply a hidden agenda, a cabal of the archaeologists
and anthropologists of the world, who somehow have all agreed to squash any
challenge to the Out of Africa theory. The authors make it sound as if any
evidence whatsoever supporting an Australian birthplace have been
systematically hunted down, removed from museums, and data erased throughout
the world.
The problem is, most of the data and evidence claimed by
the authors happened or was discovered in the late 1920’s and just before WWII.
Louis Leakey did not find his African specimens until the
late 1950’s and the actual Out Of Africa theory was not even posited until the
1990’s.
How can they claim a conspiracy when the Australian ‘data’,
such as it is, was discovered BEFORE the African fossils were found?
Either every person who made any sort of discovery
supporting Australia as the birthplace of humans were incredibly incompetent,
lazy, or jealous, or....the authors are full of baloney.
The “Out of Australia” theory of human evolution is an
intriguing concept. But there are too many convenient losses of genuine
artifacts, fossils, photographs, notes, and data. Too many unsubstantiated
cases of theft, subterfuge, or outright suppression of evidence. There are too
many claims of refusal of Aborigines to allow data collection. All there is in
the way of citations in the book come from a few magazine articles (amazingly,
written by the authors) and, believe it or not, the Bible.
The lack of any truly scientific citations, not a single
photo, map, drawing or graph, and an emotional claim of stonewalling, make this
book merely one of sensationalizing conjecture.
The authors of “Out of Australia”, instead of showing me
a credible and believable alternative to the Out of Africa theory, have merely
reinforced it.
24 December 2018
Pioneering in the 21st Century
Pioneering in the
21st Century
Imagine:
Living in a place where there is no crowding.
Where there are mountains you could be the first to
climb.
Where there is no crime.
Where there are no traffic jams
Where you work from where you live.
Where you don’t need money or a credit card.
Where you don’t have to pay taxes!!
Where the only artificial sounds are the ones you make.
Where you don’t have to worry about being flooded or
wildfires.
Where you needn’t worry about getting a sunburn.
Where you never have to worry about bugs biting you.
Where there is no pollution, or disease, or garbage.
Where you can feel light as a feather.
Where the winters are a year long.
Where the outdoor temperatures averages about -80°F
Where the sun is small and weak.
Where winds and sandstorms blow for months at a time
Where everything-even the sky-is red.
Where there are no cities, no restaurants,no highways.
Where there is no television, no internet, no movies.
Where you can never go outside wearing anything other
than a spacesuit.
Where you live with a few other people who you may not
like.
Where you will be working non-stop just to survive.
Where it takes 8 months for a delivery of anything.
Where there are no mechanics or surgeons.
Where you will by necessity be a vegetarian
Where you will never be able to eat a steak.
Where you will never be able to have a pet.
Where you are bathed constantly in cosmic radiation.
Where you can’t quit your job and go back home.
Where there is no life whatsoever.
Where there is no liquid water.
09 December 2018
The rich 1% have killed off the middle class
"Since
millennials first started entering the workforce, their spending habits
have been blamed for killing off industries ranging from casual restaurant dining to starter houses.
However, a new study by the Federal Reserve suggests it might be less
about how they are spending their money and more about not having any to
spend.
A study published
this month by Christopher Kurz, Geng Li and Daniel J. Vine found
millennials are less financially well-off than members of earlier
generations when they were the same ages, with "lower earnings, fewer
assets and less wealth."
Copied from NPR News, "Why aren't Millenials Spending?", 30 Nov 18
Well, Duh.
The
generation of 'millenials'..those folks born between 1981 and 1997
(who decides this sort of sorting?) were caught in the pincers of a lot
of deleterious situations. The lack of jobs in the 80's...trust me, I
know this from hard experience:, the crash of 1987..yes, there was a
stock market crash dubbed 'Black Monday" in 1987, before there was the
shopping frenzy shifted the name to Friday; the insane and meteoric rise
in student loans, the insistence that you Had to go to college in order
to get a job (that were sent off shore in the 90's), (9/11 and the
subsequent re-inventing America from a robust economic democracy to what
is now a plutocracy,) and let us not forget the Great Pumpkin currently
in the white house, who is merely the manifestation of the rich
purchasing the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the Supreme
Court. They...the rich CEO's and upper class destroyed the underpinnings
of the middle class economy by "downsizing"..a name for cutting the
work force (but not management):, disposing of things like pensions,
health benefits, a decent wage, promotions, full time jobs, sick leave,
family leave; and (in the Reagan era of "trickle down economics", broke
the backs of labor unions.
Note,
however, that members of Congress and Senate still get fat pension
((equal to their highest paid year of office)), free housing, franking privileges, and free health care, that they have insured will never be gotten rid of.
All
these factors created a flood of money to the rich at the expense of
the middle class. Now there is no middle class. Now it is the upper
poor, the poor and the very rich.
So
you have the millenials, who dutifully went to college to gain
degrees...mostly masters, (academic staff and colleges made their money) and can not find a job in the field they
chose. IF they can find a job, it is usually part time, has no
benefits, and is paid a minimum wage (that the corporations have also
refused to raise, and the legislators allow it.)
Now
you have a rich upper class and corporations that pay the same tax rate
that the guy working at Burger King. And even then, they have it
arranged so that they pay no taxes at ALL.
Thank you, Reagan, Bush and Trump.
SO
for the companies...like the 'casual dining restaurant" industry, the
car companies, and the rapacious home building (and real estate)
industry, the reason why millenials aren't buying is because they're
POOR. You made us all this way. I can no more afford to buy a new car
than I can afford to pay for a first class ticket on an airplane. The
rich have made it so that the 'little man' is carrying the entire load
and being paid NOTHING. You have turned us into serfs and slaves, so
don't bitch.
You
got what you wanted...disgusting amounts of money that you have never
shared a dime of, and treating the average American like shit. Don't
start bitching when we, the little people, don't spend the pennies we
have on your shit. We're living in shacks and eating cat food. This is
what you wanted.
You can go fuck yourself. Choke on your money.
17 November 2018
If Hillary runs, it guarantees a Trump re-election
NO,
Hillary,
NO.
You are
un-electable. In 2016, I held my nose and voted for you solely due to Trump.
We do not want
you. If you run, you will GUARANTEE Trump’s re-election.
We want new
blood. We, the Democrats of the US, want someone else. We don’t want you. We
don’t want Pelosi. We want the DNC to
LISTEN to us, instead of running the same old horses. We want someone other than you. We want someone who can WIN, not spend
time and money campaigning in some districts and ignoring the Democrats that
don’t look like you.
Go AWAY. Stop
thinking you can be President. You aren’t Presidential timber. Neither is
Trump, but you handed him the White House. Yeah, so you got more votes, but
Trump got the electoral college and that was the ones who saw through you.
Go AWAY. Stop
bothering us. We need someone else. Not YOU.
If you run you will guarantee Trump wins. Because this time I won't vote Democrat OR Republican, I will write in someone who could possibly win. It won't be YOU.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)